4.6 The Imaginary Unit and Complex Arithmetic

The imaginary unit i and the square root of a negative number, standard form and the families of complex numbers, adding and subtracting, multiplying with FOIL, dividing by a complex conjugate, and plotting in the complex plane with absolute value.

Subject: Algebra 2 · 65 slides · symbolic lesson

Open the interactive version of this deck

What this lesson covers

The lesson, slide by slide

1. Lesson 4.6 The Imaginary Unit and Complex Arithmetic

Title

Algebra 2 · Chapter 4 — Quadratic Functions and Factoring

Perform Operations with Complex Numbers

2. By the end of this lesson you can

Objectives

Five outcomes. The first one is a definition; the rest are consequences of it.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 275-281 — the lesson these objectives are drawn from

3. What you already have

Warm-up

Lesson 4.5 hit one wall: a square equal to a negative number has no real solution.

Discussion prompt

Solve 2x squared plus 11 equals negative 37 as far as the methods of Lesson 4.5 will take you. Where exactly does it stop, and why?

Hint: Isolate the squared term first.

Answer:

\[ 2x^2 + 11 = -37 \;\Longrightarrow\; 2x^2 = -48 \;\Longrightarrow\; x^2 = -24 \]

The method stops here. Every real number squares to something non-negative, so no real x can work. This lesson does not find a trick to get around that — it enlarges the number system so that a square root of a negative number exists, and then the same method runs to completion.

4. One new number, and everything else follows

Concept

Mathematicians defined a single new number, the imaginary unit i, whose square is negative one. Combining it with the real numbers gives the complex numbers, written a plus bi, and every rule of arithmetic you already know carries over unchanged.

imaginary unit i — The number defined by i equals the square root of negative one, so that i squared equals negative one. It is used to write the square root of any negative number.

\[ i = \sqrt{-1}, \qquad i^2 = -1 \]

This is not a trick or an approximation. It is an extension of the number system, in exactly the same spirit as the extension from whole numbers to negatives, or from fractions to irrationals: each was invented so that a class of previously unsolvable equations could be solved.

Figure (svg): The definition of the imaginary unit and the rule for the square root of a negative number

Nothing is being assumed about i beyond the single equation i squared equals negative one; every rule below follows from it.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 275-275

5. The imaginary unit

Section

Section 1

6. The square root of a negative number

Concept

For a positive number r, the square root of negative r is i times the square root of r. Squaring that expression returns negative r, which is the check that the definition does what was wanted.

\[ \sqrt{-r} = i\sqrt{r}, \qquad (i\sqrt{r})^2 = i^2 r = -r \]

The simplification rules of Lesson 4.5 still apply inside the radical: pull out the largest perfect-square factor first, then attach the i.

Figure (svg): The definition of the imaginary unit and the rule for the square root of a negative number

Nothing is being assumed about i beyond the single equation i squared equals negative one; every rule below follows from it.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 275-275 — The Square Root of a Negative Number

7. The definition and its check

Picture it

One equation, two properties that follow from it.

Figure (svg): The definition of the imaginary unit and the rule for the square root of a negative number

Nothing is being assumed about i beyond the single equation i squared equals negative one; every rule below follows from it.

Property 2 is what makes the whole thing legitimate: the new number really does square to a negative, so it really does solve the equation that had no answer.

8. Worked example: solve an equation with no real solutions

Worked example

Example 1. The same four steps as Lesson 4.5, with one extra.

\[ \text{Solve } 2x^2 + 11 = -37. \]

Isolate the squared term

Why: Subtracting 11 gives 2x squared equal to negative 48, and dividing by 2 gives x squared equal to negative 24.

\[ x ^{2} = -24 \]

Take square roots of both sides

Why: Both signs are written, exactly as before.

\[ x = +- \sqrt{-24} \]

Write in terms of i

Why: The square root of negative 24 is i times the square root of 24.

\[ x = +- i \sqrt{24} \]

Simplify the radical

Why: Twenty-four is 4 times 6, so the 4 comes out as 2.

\[ x = +- 2 i \sqrt{6} \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example solve an equation with no real solutions shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = \pm 2i\sqrt{6} \]

Verify: square the answer and substitute

Why: Two i root 6, squared, is 4 times i squared times 6, which is 24 times negative one, or negative 24. Then 2 times negative 24 is negative 48, plus 11 is negative 37 — the right side exactly. The negative solution behaves identically because squaring erases its sign.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 275-275

9. Radical to imaginary form

Matching

Pull out the square factor, then attach the i.

Match the pairs

  • l1. sqrt(-24)
  • l2. sqrt(-8)
  • l3. sqrt(-28)
  • l4. sqrt(-13)
  • r1. 2i sqrt(6)
  • r2. 2i sqrt(2)
  • r3. 2i sqrt(7)
  • r4. i sqrt(13)

Why: Three of the four radicands contain the square factor 4, which comes out as a 2 in front. The last has no square factor at all, so the i sits directly against the radical. The order of operations is always the same: strip the minus sign into an i, then simplify what is left exactly as in Lesson 4.5.

10. Worked example: six more equations

Worked example

Guided Practice 1 to 6.

\[ \text{Solve } x^2 = -13, \; x^2 = -38, \; x^2 + 11 = 3, \; x^2 - 8 = -36, \; 3x^2 - 7 = -31, \; 5x^2 + 33 = 3. \]

The two direct ones

Why: Thirteen and 38 have no square factors, so the radicals stay as they are.

\[ x = +- i \sqrt{13}; + - i \sqrt{38} \]

The two needing one move

Why: Subtracting 11 gives negative 8, and adding 8 gives negative 28.

\[ x ^{2} = -8; x ^{2} = -28 \]

Simplify those two

Why: Eight is 4 times 2 and 28 is 4 times 7.

\[ +- 2 i \sqrt{2}; + - 2 i \sqrt{7} \]

The two with coefficients

Why: Three x squared equal to negative 24 gives x squared equal to negative 8; five x squared equal to negative 30 gives negative 6.

\[ +- 2 i \sqrt{2}; + - i \sqrt{6} \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example six more equations shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ \pm i\sqrt{13}, \; \pm i\sqrt{38}, \; \pm 2i\sqrt{2}, \; \pm 2i\sqrt{7}, \; \pm 2i\sqrt{2}, \; \pm i\sqrt{6} \]

Verify: check the third and fifth agree

Why: Both reduce to x squared equal to negative 8 and so have the same solutions, even though one started with a constant to move and the other with a coefficient to divide by. Squaring 2i root 2 gives 4 times negative one times 2, which is negative 8, as required.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 275-275

11. Trap: multiplying two negative radicands

Trap

The trap

\[ \sqrt{-4}\cdot\sqrt{-9} \]

Apply the product property from Lesson 4.5

Why: The two radicands are multiplied under a single radical.

\[ \sqrt{(-4)(-9)} = \sqrt{36} = 6 \quad \text{(wrong)} \]

Converting to i first gives 2i times 3i, which is 6i squared, or negative 6. The two answers differ in sign.

The fix

\[ \sqrt{-4}\cdot\sqrt{-9} = (2i)(3i) = 6i^2 = -6 \]

Write every negative radicand in terms of i before multiplying

Why: The product property was stated for non-negative radicands only, and this is exactly where it fails.

\[ \sqrt{ab} = \sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} \quad \text{requires } a \ge 0 \text{ and } b \ge 0 \]

The condition on the property was not decoration. Convert first, then use ordinary multiplication, and the i squared takes care of the sign automatically.

12. Complete the solution

Fill the middle

Example 1, at the radical.

Fill in the blanks

x = \pm\sqrt2 = \pm i\sqrt___ = \pm ___i\sqrt___

Why: Twenty-four is 4 times 6, so the root of 4 comes out as 2 and root 6 stays under the radical. Writing 2i root 6 rather than i root 24 matters for the same reason it mattered in Lesson 4.5: the radicand must have no perfect-square factor left for the expression to count as simplified.

13. Was i invented or discovered?

Prediction

Commit before reasoning.

Predict first

Which earlier extension of the number system is i most like?

  • Extending the whole numbers to include negatives
  • Rounding to a decimal approximation
  • Using a variable to stand for an unknown
  • None — i is unlike anything earlier

Correct: Extending the whole numbers to include negatives.

\[ \mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{Q} \subset \mathbb{R} \subset \mathbb{C} \]

Why: Negative numbers were introduced so that 5 minus 8 would have an answer, fractions so that 2 divided by 3 would, and irrationals so that the square root of 2 would. Each time the rules of arithmetic were preserved and one class of unsolvable problems became solvable. The imaginary unit is the same move applied to the square root of a negative, and it is the last such extension you will need: with i in hand, every polynomial equation has solutions.

14. Real or not?

Sorting

Ask whether a square root of a negative appears.

Sort into buckets

Sort each solution set.

Two real solutions
x^2 = 12; 3x^2 + 5 = 41
Two imaginary solutions
x^2 = -24; x^2 - 8 = -36; 5x^2 + 33 = 3
real
Isolating the square leaves a positive number on the right, so ordinary square roots suffice and no i is needed. Both solutions are irrational here, but irrational is not the same as imaginary.
imag
Isolating the square leaves a negative number on the right, so no real number can satisfy the equation and the solutions involve i. Note that all three still have exactly two solutions.

Every one of these has two solutions. What changes is which number system they live in, and that is decided entirely by the sign after the square is isolated.

15. Standard form, adding and subtracting

Section

Section 2

16. Real parts together, imaginary parts together

Concept

A complex number in standard form is a plus bi, where a is the real part and bi the imaginary part. To add or subtract two of them, combine the real parts and the imaginary parts separately, exactly as you would collect like terms.

complex number — A number a plus bi with a and b real. If b is not zero it is an imaginary number; if in addition a is zero it is a pure imaginary number. Two complex numbers are equal exactly when their real parts agree and their imaginary parts agree.

\[ (a + bi) + (c + di) = (a + c) + (b + d)i \]

Because b can be zero, every real number is also a complex number. The real numbers did not go anywhere; they are the complex numbers with no imaginary part.

Figure (svg): Nested regions showing complex numbers containing the real numbers and the imaginary numbers, with pure imaginary numbers inside the latter

The real numbers did not go anywhere; they sit inside a larger system as the case where the imaginary part is zero.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 276-276 — Sums and Differences of Complex Numbers

17. Which numbers are which

Picture it

One system containing the reals and the imaginaries side by side.

Figure (svg): Nested regions showing complex numbers containing the real numbers and the imaginary numbers, with pure imaginary numbers inside the latter

The real numbers did not go anywhere; they sit inside a larger system as the case where the imaginary part is zero.

Notice that real and imaginary do not overlap, and that pure imaginary is a special case of imaginary, not a separate family. The number 5 minus 5i is imaginary but not pure imaginary.

18. Worked example: add and subtract

Worked example

Example 2, all three parts.

\[ \text{Simplify } (8 - i) + (5 + 4i), \; (7 - 6i) - (3 - 6i), \; 10 - (6 + 7i) + 4i. \]

First: add the parts separately

Why: Eight plus 5 is 13, and negative 1 plus 4 is 3.

\[ 13 + 3 i \]

Second: subtract the parts separately

Why: Seven minus 3 is 4, and negative 6 plus 6 is 0.

\[ 4 + 0 i = 4 \]

Note what the second result is

Why: The imaginary part vanished, so the answer is a real number — written as 4, not as 4 plus 0i.

Third: work left to right

Why: Ten minus 6 is 4 with negative 7i, then adding 4i gives negative 3i.

\[ 4 - 3 i \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example add and subtract shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ 13 + 3i, \quad 4, \quad 4 - 3i \]

Verify: reverse the second subtraction

Why: Adding the answer back: 4 plus the quantity 3 minus 6i is 7 minus 6i, which is the number subtracted from. Subtraction and addition undo each other here exactly as they do for real numbers, which is the point of defining the operations part by part.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 276-276

19. Which family?

Sorting

Look at whether a is zero, b is zero, or neither.

Sort into buckets

Sort each complex number.

Real
-1
Imaginary but not pure
5 - 5i; 2 + 3i
Pure imaginary
6i; -4i
real
The imaginary part is zero, so the number sits on the real axis. It is still a complex number, written with b equal to 0.
imag
Both parts are non-zero, so the number is imaginary but has a real component as well. Most complex numbers are of this kind.
pure
The real part is zero and the imaginary part is not, so the number sits on the imaginary axis. Pure imaginary is a special case of imaginary, not a separate category.

Every item here is a complex number. The three buckets are subdivisions of one system, which is what the nested diagram shows.

20. Worked example: impedance in a circuit

Worked example

Example 3. A real situation where complex addition is the natural language.

\[ \text{A series circuit has a } 5 \text{ ohm resistor, a } 3 \text{ ohm inductor and a } 4 \text{ ohm capacitor. Find its impedance.} \]

Convert each component to an impedance

Why: A resistance R contributes R, an inductive reactance L contributes L times i, and a capacitive reactance C contributes negative C times i.

\[ 5, 3 i, -4 i \]

Add the impedances

Why: Impedance in a series circuit is the sum of the individual impedances.

\[ 5 + 3 i + (-4 i) \]

Combine the imaginary parts

Why: Three i minus 4i is negative i.

\[ 5 - i \]

Interpret the answer

Why: The real part is the resistance and the imaginary part is the net reactance, which here is capacitive because it is negative.

\[ 5 - i\text{ ohms} \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example impedance in a circuit shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ 5 - i \text{ ohms} \]

Verify: change one component and see what happens

Why: Guided Practice 10 replaces the capacitor with a 7 ohm one, giving 5 plus 3i minus 7i, or 5 minus 4i. The real part is unchanged because only the reactances moved, which confirms that the two parts really do track separate physical quantities rather than being an arbitrary bookkeeping device.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 277-277

21. Find the error: distributing a subtraction

Error analysis

A student subtracts one complex number from another.

Annotate

On: \( (3 + 7i) - (8 - 2i) = 3 - 8 + 7i - 2i = -5 + 5i \)

  • Collecting real parts and imaginary parts separately is the right idea.
  • But the minus sign was applied to the 8 only, not to the -2i.
  • Subtracting -2i means adding 2i, so the imaginary part is 7 + 2 = 9, not 7 - 2.
  • The correct answer is -5 + 9i. Checking: (-5 + 9i) + (8 - 2i) = 3 + 7i, the original.

The same slip as distributing a negative over a bracket in Lesson 1.2. Rewrite the subtraction as adding the opposite of the whole number and it cannot happen.

22. Combine the parts

Fill the middle

Guided Practice 9.

Fill in the blanks

-4 - (1 + i) - (5 + 9i) = -10 - 10i

Why: The real parts give negative 4 minus 1 minus 5, which is negative 10, and the imaginary parts give negative 1 minus 9, which is negative 10. Both subtractions apply to the whole bracket, and the fact that both parts came out as negative 10 is a coincidence worth noticing so it does not become an assumption.

23. One of these claims is false

Two truths and a lie

All three are about the families of complex numbers.

Eliminate the wrong options

Two of these are true. Knock those out and keep the false one.

  • A. Every real number is a complex number
  • C. 5 - 5i is imaginary but not pure imaginary
  • B. Every complex number is an imaginary number

Survives elimination: B

Why: The survivor is the false one, and the textbook asks about it directly in Exercise 2. Imaginary requires b to be non-zero, and a real number such as negative 1 is complex with b equal to zero. The containment runs one way only: all imaginary numbers are complex, but not all complex numbers are imaginary.

24. When can two complex numbers be equal?

Prediction

Commit before reasoning.

Predict first

If x plus yi equals 5 minus 3i, with x and y real, what are x and y?

  • x = 5 and y = -3
  • x = 5 and y = 3
  • There is not enough information
  • x and y could be many pairs

Correct: x equals 5 and y equals negative 3.

\[ a + bi = c + di \;\Longleftrightarrow\; a = c \text{ and } b = d \]

Why: Two complex numbers are equal exactly when their real parts agree and their imaginary parts agree, so a single complex equation carries two real equations inside it. That is genuinely useful: it lets one equation determine two unknowns, and it is why complex numbers are convenient in physics and engineering rather than merely legal.

25. Multiplying

Section

Section 3

26. FOIL, then replace i squared

Concept

Complex numbers are multiplied by the distributive property or FOIL, exactly as binomials are. The one extra step is that any i squared produced along the way is replaced by negative one, which turns an imaginary term into a real one.

\[ (9 - 2i)(-4 + 7i) = -36 + 63i + 8i - 14i^2 = -22 + 71i \]

The i squared term always changes sign and moves into the real part, which is why the real part of a product is rarely just the product of the two real parts.

Figure (svg): A grid showing the four products of FOIL for two complex numbers, with the i squared term converted

The only step that is not ordinary algebra is the single substitution of negative one for i squared.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 277-277 — Multiply complex numbers

27. Four products, one substitution

Picture it

Example 4b, laid out as a grid.

Figure (svg): A grid showing the four products of FOIL for two complex numbers, with the i squared term converted

The only step that is not ordinary algebra is the single substitution of negative one for i squared.

Three of the four cells are ordinary algebra. The fourth, highlighted, is the only place the new number does anything, and it contributes to the real part rather than the imaginary one.

28. Worked example: multiply complex numbers

Worked example

Example 4, both parts.

\[ \text{Simplify } 4i(-6 + i) \text{ and } (9 - 2i)(-4 + 7i). \]

Distribute in the first

Why: Four i times negative 6 is negative 24i, and 4i times i is 4i squared.

\[ -24 i + 4 i ^{2} \]

Replace i squared

Why: Four times negative one is negative 4, which is a real term.

\[ -24 i - 4 \]

Write in standard form

Why: The real part comes first.

\[ -4 - 24 i \]

FOIL the second

Why: The four products are negative 36, 63i, 8i and negative 14i squared, and the last becomes positive 14.

\[ -36 + 14 + 71 i \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example multiply complex numbers shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ -4 - 24i \qquad \text{and} \qquad -22 + 71i \]

Verify: check the second product's real part

Why: The real contributions are negative 36 from the outer constants and positive 14 from the i squared term, giving negative 22. Had the i squared been left alone, the answer would have kept an i squared term and would not be in standard form at all — that substitution is what makes the product a complex number rather than an unfinished expression.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 277-278

29. Replace i squared

Fill the middle

Example 4a, at the substitution.

Fill in the blanks

4i(-6 + i) = -24i + 4i^2 = -24i + 4(-1) = -4 - 24i

Why: Four times negative one is negative 4, a real number, so it becomes the real part of the answer. Note the reordering at the end: standard form always writes the real part first, even when the imaginary term was produced first.

30. Worked example: two more products

Worked example

Guided Practice 11 and 12.

\[ \text{Simplify } i(9 - i) \text{ and } (3 + i)(5 - i). \]

Distribute the first

Why: I times 9 is 9i, and i times negative i is negative i squared.

\[ 9 i - i ^{2} \]

Replace and reorder

Why: Negative i squared is positive 1, so the answer is 1 plus 9i.

\[ 1 + 9 i \]

FOIL the second

Why: The four products are 15, negative 3i, 5i and negative i squared.

\[ 15 + 2 i - i ^{2} \]

Replace and combine

Why: Negative i squared is positive 1, so the real part is 16.

\[ 16 + 2 i \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example two more products shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ 1 + 9i \qquad \text{and} \qquad 16 + 2i \]

Verify: notice where the real part came from

Why: In both, the real part of the answer is larger than a naive guess, because negative i squared contributed a positive number. In the second, 3 times 5 is 15 but the answer's real part is 16 — the extra 1 came entirely from the imaginary terms multiplying each other.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 278-278

31. Trap: leaving i squared in the answer

Trap

The trap

\[ (3 + i)(5 - i) = 15 - 3i + 5i - i^2 \]

Collect like terms and stop

Why: The i squared term is treated as if it were another kind of term to be collected.

\[ 15 + 2i - i^2 \quad \text{(wrong: not standard form)} \]

The expression is correct but unfinished. Standard form is a plus bi, and an i squared term belongs in neither slot.

The fix

\[ 15 + 2i - i^2 = 15 + 2i - (-1) = 16 + 2i \]

Substitute negative one for i squared before collecting

Why: The substitution is not optional tidying; it is what turns the expression into a complex number.

\[ i^2 = -1 \;\Longrightarrow\; -i^2 = +1 \]

Watch the sign carefully: the term is negative i squared, so replacing i squared by negative one makes it positive one. Sign errors here are the single most common source of wrong real parts.

32. Product to standard form

Matching

FOIL, then substitute.

Match the pairs

  • l1. 4i(-6 + i)
  • l2. (9 - 2i)(-4 + 7i)
  • l3. i(9 - i)
  • l4. (3 + i)(5 - i)
  • r1. -4 - 24i
  • r2. -22 + 71i
  • r3. 1 + 9i
  • r4. 16 + 2i

Why: In every one of these the i squared term contributed to the real part. Two of them started with a purely imaginary factor, which is why their answers still have both parts: multiplying by i does not keep a number imaginary, it rotates it.

33. What does multiplying by i do?

Prediction

Commit before reasoning.

Predict first

Multiply 1, then i, then i squared, then i cubed, by i each time. What happens?

  • The values grow without bound
  • The values cycle through i, -1, -i, 1 and repeat
  • The values shrink toward zero
  • Nothing predictable happens

Correct: The values cycle through i, negative 1, negative i, 1, and repeat.

\[ i^1 = i, \; i^2 = -1, \; i^3 = -i, \; i^4 = 1, \; i^5 = i, \; \dots \]

Why: Multiplying by i takes 1 to i, i to negative 1, negative 1 to negative i, and negative i back to 1, so the powers of i repeat with period four. In the complex plane of the last idea this is a quarter turn about the origin each time, which is why complex multiplication turns up wherever rotation does. It also gives a quick way to evaluate any power of i: divide the exponent by 4 and use the remainder.

34. Multiplying binomials against multiplying complex numbers

Comparison

Fill the blanks. Only one row differs.

Comparison matrix

Step(3 + x)(5 - x)(3 + i)(5 - i)
The four products15, -3x, 5x, -x^215, -3i, 5i, -i^2
Combine the middle+2x+2i
The squared termstays as -x^2becomes +1
The result-x^2 + 2x + 1516 + 2i

Everything is identical until the squared term. Because i squared is a number rather than a term, the complex product collapses to two terms while the polynomial keeps three.

35. Dividing

Section

Section 4

36. Clear the denominator with a complex conjugate

Concept

A quotient is not in standard form while an i remains in the denominator. Multiplying the numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator makes the denominator real, after which the quotient splits into a real part and an imaginary part.

complex conjugates — The numbers a plus bi and a minus bi. Their product, a squared plus b squared, is always a real number.

\[ (a + bi)(a - bi) = a^2 + b^2 \]

This is the same manoeuvre as rationalising a denominator in Lesson 4.5, with the same reason for working: the cross terms cancel and the squared term loses its radical, or here its i.

Figure (svg): Dividing by a complex conjugate, with the cancelling middle terms highlighted

Complex conjugates work for the same reason radical conjugates did in Lesson 4.5: the cross terms cancel exactly.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 278-278 — Complex conjugates

37. One division, worked through

Picture it

Example 5: 7 plus 5i over 1 minus 4i.

Figure (svg): Dividing by a complex conjugate, with the cancelling middle terms highlighted

Complex conjugates work for the same reason radical conjugates did in Lesson 4.5: the cross terms cancel exactly.

The denominator's two imaginary terms cancel and its i squared term flips sign, leaving 1 plus 16, or 17. From there the quotient is just a fraction with a whole-number bottom.

38. Worked example: divide complex numbers

Worked example

Example 5. Multiply by the conjugate, then split.

\[ \text{Write } \frac{7 + 5i}{1 - 4i} \text{ in standard form.} \]

Identify the conjugate of the denominator

Why: The denominator is 1 minus 4i, so its conjugate is 1 plus 4i.

\[ \text{multiply by } \frac{1 + 4 i}{1 + 4 i} \]

Multiply out the numerator

Why: The four products are 7, 28i, 5i and 20i squared, and the last becomes negative 20.

\[ -13 + 33 i \]

Multiply out the denominator

Why: The four products are 1, 4i, negative 4i and negative 16i squared; the middle terms cancel and the last becomes positive 16.

\[ 17 \]

Split into standard form

Why: Dividing each part by 17 gives the real and imaginary parts separately.

\[ -\frac{13}{17} + (\frac{33}{17}) i \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example divide complex numbers shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ -\tfrac{13}{17} + \tfrac{33}{17}i \]

Verify: multiply the answer back by the denominator

Why: Multiplying negative 13 over 17 plus 33 over 17 i by 1 minus 4i gives, after clearing the 17, the quantity negative 13 plus 33i times 1 minus 4i, which is negative 13 plus 52i plus 33i plus 132, or 119 plus 85i; dividing by 17 gives 7 plus 5i, the original numerator. Division really is the inverse of multiplication here.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 278-278

39. Denominator to its conjugate

Matching

Change only the sign between the parts.

Match the pairs

  • l1. 1 - 4i
  • l2. 1 + i
  • l3. 3 - 2i
  • l4. -2 + 5i
  • r1. 1 + 4i
  • r2. 1 - i
  • r3. 3 + 2i
  • r4. -2 - 5i

Why: Only the sign of the imaginary part changes; the real part is copied unchanged, including its own sign. The last one is the useful check on that: its conjugate is negative 2 minus 5i, not 2 minus 5i.

40. Worked example: two more quotients

Worked example

Guided Practice 13 and 14.

\[ \text{Write } \frac{5}{1 + i} \text{ and } \frac{5 + 2i}{3 - 2i} \text{ in standard form.} \]

First: multiply by 1 minus i

Why: The denominator becomes 1 plus 1, which is 2, and the numerator becomes 5 minus 5i.

\[ \frac{5 - 5 i}{2} \]

Split the first

Why: Each part is divided by 2.

\[ \frac{5}{2} - (\frac{5}{2}) i \]

Second: multiply by 3 plus 2i

Why: The denominator becomes 9 plus 4, which is 13.

\[ \text{denominator } 13 \]

Multiply out the second numerator

Why: The four products are 15, 10i, 6i and 4i squared, and the last becomes negative 4.

\[ 11 + 16 i \]

Split the second

Why: Each part is divided by 13.

\[ \frac{11}{13} + (\frac{16}{13}) i \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example two more quotients shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ \tfrac{5}{2} - \tfrac{5}{2}i \qquad \text{and} \qquad \tfrac{11}{13} + \tfrac{16}{13}i \]

Verify: check the denominators against the shortcut

Why: For 1 plus i the conjugate product is 1 squared plus 1 squared, or 2; for 3 minus 2i it is 3 squared plus 2 squared, or 13. Both match the long multiplication, so the formula a squared plus b squared can be used directly and only the numerator needs FOIL.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 278-278

41. Find the error: using the wrong conjugate

Error analysis

A student divides by multiplying top and bottom by the numerator's conjugate.

Annotate

On: \( \frac{7 + 5i}{1 - 4i}\cdot\frac{7 - 5i}{7 - 5i} = \frac{49 + 25}{7 - 28i - 35i + 20i^2} \)

  • Multiplying by a fraction equal to 1 is legal, so nothing false has been written.
  • But the goal was a real denominator, and the denominator is now more complicated than before.
  • The conjugate must be that of the DENOMINATOR, which is 1 - 4i, so the multiplier is 1 + 4i.
  • With the right conjugate the denominator becomes 1 + 16 = 17, and the quotient splits at once.

Read the denominator, change the sign between its two parts, and multiply by that. Whatever is happening in the numerator is irrelevant to the choice.

42. Complete the conjugate product

Fill the middle

Example 5, at the denominator.

Fill in the blanks

(1 - 4i)(1 + 4i) = 1 + 4i - 4i - 16i^2 = 1 + 16 = 17

Why: The imaginary terms cancel and negative 16i squared becomes positive 16, giving 17. In general the product is a squared plus b squared, which is a sum rather than a difference — the opposite of the radical conjugates in Lesson 4.5, and the sign flip comes from i squared being negative.

43. Order the division steps

Ranking

Writing a quotient in standard form.

Put in order

  1. Read the denominator and write down its complex conjugate
  2. Multiply numerator and denominator by that conjugate
  3. Expand the numerator with FOIL and replace i squared by -1
  4. Simplify the denominator to the real number a^2 + b^2
  5. Divide each part of the numerator by that real number

Why: The last step is the one that produces standard form: until the numerator is split, the answer is a single fraction rather than a real part plus an imaginary part. The denominator can be written down directly from a squared plus b squared, so in practice only the numerator needs expanding.

44. Why is the conjugate product always real?

Prediction

Commit before reasoning.

Predict first

Multiplying a plus bi by a minus bi gives a squared plus b squared. Where did the imaginary part go?

  • It was discarded as an approximation
  • The two cross terms are exact opposites and cancel
  • The i squared term cancelled it
  • It only works for particular values of a and b

Correct: The two cross terms are exact opposites and cancel.

\[ (a+bi)(a-bi) = a^2 - abi + abi - b^2i^2 = a^2 + b^2 \]

Why: The outer term is negative abi and the inner term is positive abi, so they sum to zero for every a and b. What remains is a squared minus b squared times i squared, and since i squared is negative one that becomes a squared plus b squared. Both the cancellation and the sign flip are automatic, which is why the conjugate trick never fails.

45. The complex plane and absolute value

Section

Section 5

46. Complex numbers are points, not places on a line

Concept

Every complex number a plus bi corresponds to a point in the complex plane: a units along the horizontal real axis and b units along the vertical imaginary axis. The absolute value of a complex number is its distance from the origin.

absolute value of a complex number — For z equal to a plus bi, the non-negative real number given by the square root of a squared plus b squared. It is the distance between z and the origin in the complex plane.

\[ \lvert a + bi \rvert = \sqrt{a^2 + b^2} \]

The real numbers occupy the horizontal axis, so the familiar number line is still there as one line inside a whole plane. That is why complex numbers cannot be ordered: there is no sensible way to say which of two points in a plane is larger.

Figure (svg): Four complex numbers plotted in the complex plane, with the real axis horizontal and the imaginary axis vertical

The real numbers are exactly the points on the horizontal axis, which is the old number line sitting inside the new plane.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 278-279 — Absolute Value of a Complex Number

47. Four numbers plotted

Picture it

Example 6: 3 minus 2i, negative 2 plus 4i, 3i, and negative 4 minus 3i.

Figure (svg): Four complex numbers plotted in the complex plane, with the real axis horizontal and the imaginary axis vertical

The real numbers are exactly the points on the horizontal axis, which is the old number line sitting inside the new plane.

The pure imaginary number 3i lies on the vertical axis, and any real number would lie on the horizontal one. Position encodes both parts at once.

48. Worked example: plot complex numbers

Worked example

Example 6, all four.

\[ \text{Plot } 3 - 2i, \; -2 + 4i, \; 3i, \; -4 - 3i. \]

First: read the two parts

Why: The real part 3 moves right, and the imaginary part negative 2 moves down.

\[ \text{right } 3,\text{ down } 2 \]

Second

Why: Real part negative 2 moves left; imaginary part 4 moves up.

\[ \text{left } 2,\text{ up } 4 \]

Third

Why: The real part is zero, so there is no horizontal movement at all.

\[ \text{up } 3,\text{ on the imaginary axis} \]

Fourth

Why: Real part negative 4 moves left; imaginary part negative 3 moves down.

\[ \text{left } 4,\text{ down } 3 \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example plot complex numbers shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ 3 - 2i, \; -2 + 4i, \; 3i, \; -4 - 3i \]

Verify: check which axis each point relates to

Why: The third point lies exactly on the imaginary axis because its real part is zero, and no point here lies on the real axis because none has imaginary part zero. Plotting a real number would put it on the horizontal axis, which is precisely the number line you have used since Lesson 1.1.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 278-278

49. Number to absolute value

Matching

Square both parts, add, take the root.

Match the pairs

  • l1. -4 + 3i
  • l2. 4 - i
  • l3. 2 + 5i
  • l4. -4i
  • r1. 5
  • r2. sqrt(17)
  • r3. sqrt(29)
  • r4. 4

Why: Two of these come out as whole numbers because their parts form a Pythagorean triple or because one part is zero. The other two stay as radicals, which is normal — an absolute value is only whole when the two parts happen to be legs of a right triangle with a whole hypotenuse.

50. Worked example: absolute values

Worked example

Example 7 and Guided Practice 15 to 18.

\[ \text{Find } \lvert -4 + 3i \rvert, \; \lvert -3i \rvert, \; \lvert 4 - i \rvert, \; \lvert -3 - 4i \rvert, \; \lvert 2 + 5i \rvert, \; \lvert -4i \rvert. \]

First: square both parts and add

Why: Negative 4 squared is 16 and 3 squared is 9, giving 25.

\[ \sqrt{25} = 5 \]

Second: treat it as 0 plus negative 3i

Why: Zero squared plus negative 3 squared is 9.

\[ \sqrt{9} = 3 \]

The next two

Why: Sixteen plus 1 is 17; 9 plus 16 is 25.

\[ \sqrt{17}; 5 \]

The last two

Why: Four plus 25 is 29; 0 plus 16 is 16.

\[ \sqrt{29}; 4 \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example absolute values shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ 5, \; 3, \; \sqrt{17}, \; 5, \; \sqrt{29}, \; 4 \]

Verify: notice two numbers with the same absolute value

Why: Negative 4 plus 3i and negative 3 minus 4i both have absolute value 5, because both are 5 units from the origin — they lie on the same circle. Absolute value therefore does not determine a complex number, only its distance from zero, which is exactly the same situation as for real numbers where 5 and negative 5 share an absolute value.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 279-279

51. Find the error: forgetting to square before adding

Error analysis

A student computes an absolute value.

Annotate

On: \( \lvert -4 + 3i \rvert = -4 + 3 = -1 \)

  • The two parts were correctly identified as -4 and 3.
  • But absolute value is a distance, and a distance can never be negative.
  • The definition squares each part first, adds, and then takes the square root: sqrt(16 + 9).
  • The correct value is sqrt(25) = 5, which matches the 3-4-5 right triangle in the plane.

The squaring is what removes the signs, which is why the answer is always non-negative. It is the Pythagorean theorem, and a hypotenuse is never negative.

52. Compute an absolute value

Fill the middle

Example 7a.

Fill in the blanks

\lvert -4 + 3i \rvert = \sqrt25 = \sqrt___} = 5

Why: Negative 4 squared is positive 16, and 3 squared is 9, giving 25 under the radical. The signs disappear at the squaring step, which is why negative 4 plus 3i and 4 plus 3i have the same absolute value: they are mirror images across the imaginary axis and equally far from the origin.

53. Where does each number sit?

Sorting

Look at which part is zero, if either.

Sort into buckets

Sort each complex number by its position.

On the imaginary axis
3i; -4i
On the real axis
-1
Off both axes
3 - 2i; -4 - 3i
vert
The real part is zero, so there is no horizontal movement and the point lies on the vertical axis. These are the pure imaginary numbers.
horiz
The imaginary part is zero, so the point lies on the horizontal axis. This axis is the ordinary real number line, sitting inside the plane.
off
Both parts are non-zero, so the point is genuinely two-dimensional. Most complex numbers are of this kind.

The two axes are exactly the two special families from the second idea, drawn rather than described.

54. Can complex numbers be ordered?

Prediction

Commit before reasoning.

Predict first

Is 3 plus 4i greater than 5, or less, or neither?

  • Greater, since it has more parts
  • Equal, since both have absolute value 5
  • Neither: complex numbers cannot be ordered
  • Less, since its real part is smaller

Correct: Neither — complex numbers cannot be ordered.

\[ \lvert 3 + 4i \rvert = 5 = \lvert 5 \rvert, \quad \text{but } 3 + 4i \neq 5 \]

Why: There is no way to define less than on the complex numbers that keeps the rules real inequalities obey. Both numbers do have absolute value 5, so they are the same distance from the origin, but that is a statement about distances rather than about the numbers. This is the one thing genuinely lost in the extension: you gain solutions to every quadratic and give up the number line's ordering.

55. What carried over and what did not

Comparison

Fill the blanks. The extension was designed to preserve as much as possible.

Comparison matrix

PropertyReal numbersComplex numbers
Adding and multiplyingcommutative, associative, distributiveall still hold
Every quadratic solvableno, x^2 = -1 failsyes, always
Pictured asa linea plane
Ordering, less thanyesno
Absolute valuedistance from 0 on the linedistance from 0 in the plane

The last two rows are the honest trade: the plane is richer than the line, but a plane has no natural left-to-right order.

56. The procedure, in order

Pattern

One routine per operation, all resting on i squared equals negative one.

  1. For a square root of a negative, write it as i times the square root of the positive part, then simplify the radical as in Lesson 4.5.
  2. To add or subtract, combine real parts with real parts and imaginary parts with imaginary parts, distributing any minus sign over the whole bracket.
  3. To multiply, use FOIL or the distributive property, then replace every i squared by negative one and collect into standard form.
  4. To divide, multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, simplify the denominator to a squared plus b squared, then split the fraction.
  5. To plot, move a along the real axis and b along the imaginary axis; for absolute value, take the square root of a squared plus b squared.

Every answer should end in the form a plus bi, with no i squared anywhere and no i in a denominator.

OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry 2e, §2.4 Complex Numbers §2.4

57. Check yourself 1 of 3

Check

Solving with i. Simplify the radical too.

Check your understanding

Solve 2x^2 + 11 = -37.

  • A. x = +- 2i sqrt(6) (correct)
  • B. x = +- i sqrt(24)
  • C. x = +- 2 sqrt(6)
  • D. No solution

Answer: A

Why: Isolating gives x^2 = -24, so x = +- i sqrt(24) = +- 2i sqrt(6) after simplifying.

Why B tempts people
The value is right but the radical is not simplified: 24 contains the perfect-square factor 4.
Why C tempts people
The i was dropped, which turns the answer into a real number whose square is +24, not -24.
Why D tempts people
There is no REAL solution, but the question is asked in the complex numbers, where two solutions exist.

58. Check yourself 2 of 3

Check

Multiplying. Watch the i squared term.

Check your understanding

Write (3 + i)(5 - i) in standard form.

  • A. 16 + 2i (correct)
  • B. 15 + 2i
  • C. 14 + 2i
  • D. 15 - i^2 + 2i

Answer: A

Why: FOIL gives 15 + 2i - i^2, and -i^2 is +1, so the real part is 16.

Why B tempts people
The -i^2 term was dropped instead of being converted to +1.
Why C tempts people
The sign was mishandled: -i^2 becomes +1, not -1, because i^2 is itself negative.
Why D tempts people
This is correct but not in standard form; an answer must be a + bi with no i^2 in it.

59. Check yourself 3 of 3

Check

Absolute value. Square before adding.

Check your understanding

Find |-3 - 4i|.

  • A. 5 (correct)
  • B. -7
  • C. 7
  • D. sqrt(7)

Answer: A

Why: The value is sqrt((-3)^2 + (-4)^2) = sqrt(9 + 16) = sqrt(25) = 5.

Why B tempts people
The two parts were added without squaring, and an absolute value can never be negative.
Why C tempts people
The signs were stripped and the parts added, which is not the definition; the parts must be squared first.
Why D tempts people
The parts were added before squaring and then rooted, giving sqrt(7) rather than sqrt(9 + 16).

60. Where this shows up outside the textbook

Real world

An alternating-current circuit has a resistor of 4 ohms, an inductor of 9 ohms of reactance and a capacitor of 6 ohms of reactance, all in series. Ohm's law still holds, with voltage equal to current times impedance.

Discussion prompt

Find the impedance, its absolute value, and then the voltage if a current of 3 amps flows. What does the absolute value mean physically?

Hint: Impedance is 4 plus 9i minus 6i. Voltage is a complex product.

Answer:

\[ Z = 4 + 9i - 6i = 4 + 3i \text{ ohms}, \qquad \lvert Z \rvert = \sqrt{16 + 9} = 5 \]

\[ V = IZ = 3(4 + 3i) = 12 + 9i \text{ volts} \]

The absolute value, 5 ohms, is the total opposition the circuit presents to current — the quantity an ordinary meter reads. The real and imaginary parts say how that opposition splits between resistance, which dissipates energy, and reactance, which stores and returns it.

This is why engineers use complex numbers rather than tracking two separate real quantities: the single number 4 plus 3i carries both facts, and adding components in series becomes ordinary complex addition. The absolute value from the last idea turns out to be exactly the measurable magnitude.

61. How sure are you?

Commit first

Answer, then rate your confidence honestly.

Predict first

Is the square root of negative 4 times the square root of negative 9 equal to 6?

  • Yes, since the negatives multiply to a positive
  • No, it is -6, because each radical must become an i first
  • Yes, by the product property of radicals
  • It is undefined

Correct: No — it is negative 6.

\[ \sqrt{-4}\cdot\sqrt{-9} = (2i)(3i) = 6i^2 = -6 \]

Why: Each radical becomes an imaginary number first: 2i times 3i is 6i squared, which is negative 6. The product property of Lesson 4.5 was stated only for non-negative radicands, and this is precisely the case it excludes. Applying it anyway is the single most common error with imaginary numbers, and it produces an answer with the wrong sign rather than an obviously absurd one, which is what makes it dangerous.

62. Explain it to someone a year behind you

Explain it

They have just been told that a negative number has no square root and are suspicious of this whole lesson.

Discussion prompt

In four sentences or fewer, explain what i is, why inventing it is legitimate, and what it buys you.

Hint: Compare it with the invention of negative numbers.

Answer:

The claim that a negative has no square root was always a claim about real numbers specifically. Mathematicians defined a new number i whose square is negative one, and kept every rule of arithmetic otherwise unchanged, so nothing you already knew stops being true.

That is the same move that produced negative numbers, when people wanted 5 minus 8 to have an answer, and fractions, when they wanted 2 divided by 3 to have one. What it buys is that every quadratic equation now has solutions, with no exceptions — which is what the next two lessons rely on.

63. Exit ticket

Exit ticket

Name the weakest spot before you close the deck.

Predict first

Which of these would you least want handed to you cold?

  • Simplifying a radical with a negative inside
  • Getting the sign right when i squared appears
  • Choosing and using the right conjugate
  • Computing an absolute value

Correct: Whichever you picked is tonight's ten minutes, and each has a one-line fix.

Why: For radicals, strip the minus into an i before doing anything else, then simplify as in Lesson 4.5. For i squared, write the substitution as its own line rather than doing it in your head, keeping any minus sign in front of it. For conjugates, look only at the denominator and change only the sign between its parts. For absolute value, square both parts before adding anything. Do five of your chosen kind rather than twenty mixed ones.

64. Draw the lesson on one page

Connect it up

Paper. Fifteen minutes.

Draw it

Choose the two complex numbers 3 plus 2i and 1 minus 4i and put them through everything. Top left: draw a complex plane and plot both, marking the absolute value of each as a right triangle with its legs labelled. Top right: compute their sum, their difference and their product, showing where each i squared term went. Bottom left: divide the first by the second in full, writing the conjugate you used and the real denominator it produced. Bottom right: draw the nested diagram of complex, real, imaginary and pure imaginary numbers, and place each of your six results into the right region. In a margin, write the four values of i to the first, second, third and fourth powers, and say what pattern the powers follow.

If any of your six results is real, that is not a mistake — check whether it came from a subtraction that cancelled the imaginary parts, which is exactly what happened in Example 2b.

65. What you can do now

Recap

Five things, all consequences of one definition.

If you seeThen
A negative under a radicalWrite it as i times the positive root
An i squared in an expressionReplace it by -1, keeping any minus in front
An i in a denominatorMultiply by the complex conjugate
A number with b equal to 0It is real, and lies on the horizontal axis
A number with a equal to 0It is pure imaginary, on the vertical axis
Absolute value barsSquare both parts, add, take the root

Every quadratic equation now has solutions, but you still have no method that finds them in every case. Lesson 4.7 supplies one by turning any quadratic into the square-equals-a-number shape of Lesson 4.5.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers §4.6, pp. 275-281 — everything on these slides traces back here

Sources

  1. McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 4 Quadratic Functions and Factoring — Lesson 4.6 Perform Operations with Complex Numbers — Larson, Boswell, Kanold & Stiff, McDougal Littell / Houghton Mifflin, 2007, pp. 275-281
  2. OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry 2e, §2.4 Complex Numbers

Want this taught 1-on-1? Alexander tutors Algebra 2 — $55/session, free consultation.

Book on Wyzant · Text (657) 465-8108