1.3 Solving Linear Equations

Equations, solutions and equivalent equations; the four properties of equality; isolating a variable on one side and then on both; clearing brackets and fractions; and writing an equation from a verbal model.

Subject: Algebra 2 · 65 slides · symbolic lesson

Open the interactive version of this deck

What this lesson covers

The lesson, slide by slide

1. Lesson 1.3 Solving Linear Equations

Title

Algebra 2 · Chapter 1 — Equations and Inequalities

Solve Linear Equations

2. By the end of this lesson you can

Objectives

Five outcomes. The fifth is the one every word problem in this book depends on.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-25 — the lesson these objectives are drawn from

3. What you already know about balance

Warm-up

Lesson 1.1 gave you the properties of real numbers. This lesson adds the four that apply to equations.

Discussion prompt

If you know that a equals b, name two different things you could do to both sides that would keep the statement true. Is there anything you could do to both sides that would break it?

Hint: One of the four legal moves carries a restriction. Which, and what is it?

Answer:

\[ a = b \;\Longrightarrow\; a + c = b + c \qquad a - c = b - c \]

\[ a = b, \; c \neq 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; ac = bc \qquad \tfrac{a}{c} = \tfrac{b}{c} \]

Multiplying both sides by zero breaks it — not by making a false statement, but by making a useless one. Zero equals zero is true for every value of x, so the information about which x you wanted is destroyed. That is why the multiplication and division properties both say nonzero.

4. Solving is a search for the value that balances

Concept

An equation claims that two expressions have the same value. A solution is a number that makes the claim true when it is substituted. Solving means rewriting the equation into simpler equations that have exactly the same solutions, until the answer is unavoidable.

equivalent equations — Two equations that have the same solution or solutions. Each of the four properties of equality turns an equation into an equivalent one.

\[ ax + b = 0, \quad a \neq 0 \]

That is the definition of a linear equation in one variable: it can be written in that form, with a not zero.

Figure (svg): A balance scale with four fifths of x and 8 in the left pan and 20 in the right pan, level

An equation is a claim that the two pans balance; solving is the search for the value of x that makes the claim true.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-18

5. What counts as a legal move

Section

Section 1

6. Four properties, all of them two-sided

Concept

You may add, subtract, multiply or divide — but only if you do it to both sides, and only by a nonzero number in the multiply and divide cases. Every legitimate line of every solution in this course is one of these four moves.

solution — A number that, when substituted for the variable, turns the equation into a true statement.

Because each move produces an equivalent equation, no solution is lost and none is invented along the way. That guarantee is what makes the final line trustworthy.

Figure (svg): The four properties of equality as a table: add, subtract, multiply and divide the same number on each side

Four legal moves, each applied to both sides at once; nothing else preserves the solution set.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-18 — Transformations That Produce Equivalent Equations

7. The scale, and why both sides

Picture it

The balance is not a metaphor for the answer; it is a metaphor for the rule.

Figure (svg): A balance scale with four fifths of x and 8 in the left pan and 20 in the right pan, level

An equation is a claim that the two pans balance; solving is the search for the value of x that makes the claim true.

Taking eight off only the left pan does not find x — it just breaks the scale, and with it the claim you were trying to preserve.

8. Worked example: check a proposed solution

Worked example

Before solving anything, be clear on what solving is looking for.

\[ \text{Is } x = 15 \text{ a solution of } \tfrac{4}{5}x + 8 = 20? \]

Substitute 15 for x in the original equation

Why: Checking always uses the original, never a rewritten line, because a rewritten line could itself contain the error.

Evaluate the left side

Why: Four fifths of fifteen is twelve, and twelve plus eight is twenty.

\[ 12 + 8 = 20 \]

Compare the two sides

Why: Both sides read twenty, so the statement is true.

\[ 20 = 20 \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example check a proposed solution shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ \tfrac{4}{5}(15) + 8 = 20 \quad \checkmark \]

Verify: try a nearby value to see that it fails

Why: At x equal to 14 the left side is 11.2 plus 8, which is 19.2, not 20. A solution is a single value, not a range, so a neighbour failing is exactly what should happen and confirms the check meant something.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-18

9. Step to property

Matching

Each line changed the equation in exactly one way.

Match the pairs

  • l1. From 4x + 9 = 21 to 4x = 12
  • l2. From 4x = 12 to x = 3
  • l3. From x - 13 = 21 to x = 34
  • l4. From x/5 = 4 to x = 20
  • r1. Subtraction property of equality
  • r2. Division property of equality
  • r3. Addition property of equality
  • r4. Multiplication property of equality

Why: Name the property by what was done, not by what disappeared. Nine went away because nine was subtracted; the coefficient four went away because both sides were divided by four. The two moves that undo a subtraction or a division are addition and multiplication respectively, which is why the last two are the reverses of the first two.

10. Worked example: name the property behind each move

Worked example

The same solution, annotated. Being able to name the move is what makes an unfamiliar equation approachable.

\[ \text{Solve } \tfrac{4}{5}x + 8 = 20, \text{ naming each property used.} \]

Subtract 8 from each side

Why: Subtraction property of equality. The 8 is the outermost thing wrapped around x, so it comes off first.

\[ (\frac{4}{5}) x = 12 \]

Multiply each side by 5/4

Why: Multiplication property of equality, using the reciprocal of the coefficient. Multiplying by the reciprocal is cleaner than dividing by a fraction.

\[ x = (\frac{5}{4}) (12) \]

Simplify the right side

Why: Five fourths of twelve is fifteen.

\[ x = 15 \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example name the property behind each move shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = 15 \]

Verify: substitute 15 into the original equation

Why: Four fifths of fifteen is twelve, and twelve plus eight is twenty, which matches the right side exactly. Because every step was one of the four properties, this check confirms arithmetic rather than legality.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-18

11. Trap: changing one side only

Trap

The trap

\[ 2x + 6 = 14 \]

Move the 6 across and change its sign

Why: The 6 is described as moving, which hides the fact that a move must happen on both sides.

\[ 2x = 14 \quad \text{(the 6 vanished, the 14 was never touched)} \]

\[ x = 7 \quad \text{(wrong)} \]

The fix

\[ 2x + 6 = 14 \]

Subtract 6 from BOTH sides

Why: Subtraction property of equality. What looks like moving a term is really subtracting it twice, once on each side.

\[ 2x = 8 \]

\[ x = 4 \]

The shortcut phrase move it across the equals sign and flip the sign is fine once you know what it stands for — and dangerous before then, because it lets you forget the other side.

12. Legal or not?

Sorting

Each of these is applied to the equation 3x = 12. Which preserve the solution?

Sort into buckets

Sort each proposed move.

Preserves the solution
Add 5 to both sides; Divide both sides by 3; Multiply both sides by -2
Breaks the equation
Multiply both sides by 0; Subtract x from the left side only
ok
Each is one of the four properties applied to both sides with a nonzero multiplier. Some are unhelpful — adding 5 does not get you closer to x — but unhelpful is not the same as illegal, and the solution 4 survives all of them.
no
Multiplying by zero turns the equation into 0 equals 0, which is true for every x and therefore tells you nothing: the solution is not lost so much as drowned. Changing one side only is not a property of equality at all; it simply produces a different, unrelated equation.

Notice that legal and useful are separate questions. The properties tell you what you may do; strategy tells you what is worth doing.

13. Why must it be nonzero?

Explain it to yourself

Two of the four properties carry a restriction and two do not.

\[ a = b, \; c \neq 0 \;\Longrightarrow\; ac = bc \]

Discussion prompt

Explain why the addition and subtraction properties need no restriction on c, while multiplication and division do. What exactly goes wrong if c is zero in each of those two cases?

Hint: Try multiplying x = 5 by zero and see what you are left with.

Answer:

Adding or subtracting any number, including zero, is reversible: you can always add it back. Multiplying by zero is not reversible, because every equation becomes zero equals zero and there is no way back.

\[ x = 5 \;\xrightarrow{\times 0}\; 0 = 0 \]

Dividing by zero is worse still: it is not an operation at all, since no number multiplied by zero gives a nonzero result. So one case destroys information and the other is undefined, and the restriction rules out both.

14. Which move first?

Prediction

Commit before you reason.

Predict first

In 4x + 9 = 21, which move should come first and why?

  • Divide by 4 first, to get rid of the coefficient
  • Subtract 9 first, because it is the outermost operation
  • Either order works and both are equally easy
  • Add 9 first, then divide

Correct: Subtract 9 first — but the third option is not wrong about legality, only about tidiness.

\[ 4x + 9 = 21 \;\longrightarrow\; 4x = 12 \;\longrightarrow\; x = 3 \]

\[ 4x + 9 = 21 \;\longrightarrow\; x + \tfrac{9}{4} = \tfrac{21}{4} \;\longrightarrow\; x = 3 \]

Why: Both orders are legal and both reach x equal to 3. Subtracting 9 first keeps whole numbers throughout. Dividing by 4 first gives x plus 9 over 4 equals 21 over 4, which is correct but drags fractions through the rest of the work. Undoing the outermost operation first is a strategy, not a law, and knowing it is a strategy is what lets you break it deliberately when fractions are already unavoidable.

15. Variable on one side

Section

Section 2

16. Undo in reverse order

Concept

Look at what has been done to the variable, in order, then undo those operations from the outside in. It is the same reasoning as taking off a coat before a jumper.

\[ \tfrac{4}{5}x + 8 = 20 \]

When the coefficient is a fraction, multiply by its reciprocal rather than dividing. Dividing by four fifths and multiplying by five fourths are the same move, and one of them is much easier to write.

Figure (svg): Two columns showing the order operations were applied to x and the reverse order used to undo them

Solving undoes the operations in the reverse of the order they were applied, like taking off shoes before socks.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-18

17. Built up one way, taken apart the other

Picture it

Read the left column downwards and the right column downwards; they are mirror images.

Figure (svg): Two columns showing the order operations were applied to x and the reverse order used to undo them

Solving undoes the operations in the reverse of the order they were applied, like taking off shoes before socks.

This is why the constant comes off before the coefficient: the coefficient was applied first, so it must be undone last.

18. Worked example: a fractional coefficient

Worked example

Example 1. Two ways are shown in the textbook; here is the one that keeps the numbers small.

\[ \text{Solve } \tfrac{4}{5}x + 8 = 20. \]

Subtract 8 from each side

Why: Eight is the last thing that was done to the variable expression, so it is the first thing undone.

\[ (\frac{4}{5}) x = 12 \]

Multiply each side by 5/4

Why: Five fourths is the reciprocal of four fifths, and a number times its reciprocal is 1, leaving x alone.

\[ x = (\frac{5}{4}) (12) \]

Simplify

Why: Twelve divided by four is three, and three times five is fifteen.

\[ x = 15 \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example a fractional coefficient shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = 15 \]

Verify: substitute into the original

Why: Four fifths of fifteen is twelve; twelve plus eight is twenty, which is the right side. Note also the alternative route: multiplying the whole original equation by 5 gives 4x plus 40 equals 100, then 4x equals 60, then x equals 15 — the same answer by a different first move, which is the strongest kind of check.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-18

19. Order the moves

Ranking

Solving 3 minus five thirds c equals negative two, from Exercise 17.

Put in order

  1. Start: 3 - (5/3)c = -2
  2. Subtract 3 from each side: -(5/3)c = -5
  3. Multiply each side by -3/5: c = 3
  4. Check: 3 - (5/3)(3) = 3 - 5 = -2

Why: The constant on the same side as the variable comes off first, then the coefficient is undone by multiplying by its reciprocal — and because the coefficient is negative, the reciprocal is negative too, which is what turns negative five into positive three. The check is a genuine step, not decoration: it is the only line that uses the original equation.

20. Worked example: two fractional terms

Worked example

Guided Practice 9. Two fractions on one side, and one clean way through.

\[ \text{Solve } \tfrac{1}{4}x + \tfrac{2}{5}x = 39. \]

Notice both terms are like terms

Why: Both are a number times x, so they combine before anything else needs to happen.

\[ (\frac{1}{4} + \frac{2}{5}) x = 39 \]

Add the coefficients over a common denominator

Why: Twenty is the least common denominator, so one quarter is five twentieths and two fifths is eight twentieths.

\[ (\frac{13}{20}) x = 39 \]

Multiply each side by 20/13

Why: The reciprocal of thirteen twentieths, which leaves x alone.

\[ x = (\frac{20}{13}) (39) \]

Simplify

Why: Thirty-nine divided by thirteen is three, and three times twenty is sixty.

\[ x = 60 \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example two fractional terms shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = 60 \]

Verify: substitute into the original

Why: One quarter of sixty is fifteen, and two fifths of sixty is twenty-four. Fifteen plus twenty-four is thirty-nine, matching the right side. Choosing sixty was not luck: the least common denominator of 4 and 5 divides it, which is why the arithmetic came out whole.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 21-21

21. Trap: dividing by only part of the side

Trap

The trap

\[ 4x + 12 = 28 \]

Divide by 4 to remove the coefficient

Why: The division is applied to the term the student was looking at, not to the whole side.

\[ x + 12 = 7 \quad \text{(wrong: the 12 was not divided)} \]

\[ x = -5 \]

The fix

\[ 4x + 12 = 28 \]

Divide EVERY term on both sides by 4

Why: The division property applies to the whole side, and a side is a single quantity even when it is written as a sum.

\[ x + 3 = 7 \]

\[ x = 4 \]

Or subtract 12 first and avoid the issue entirely — which is why undoing the outermost operation first is the standard advice.

22. Supply the missing line

Fill the middle

Exercise 16. The middle step has been erased.

Fill in the blanks

\tfrac\frac{3}{11}b = 0___b + 5 = 5 \;\longrightarrow\; ___ \;\longrightarrow\; b = 0

Why: Subtracting five from each side leaves three elevenths of b equal to zero. Multiplying by the reciprocal eleven thirds then gives b equal to zero, because any number times zero is zero. This one is worth doing because zero is a perfectly good solution and students often distrust it, expecting solutions to be interesting.

23. Three wrong solutions

Elimination

Exercise 19, as it appears on the page.

Eliminate the wrong options

What is the solution of 4x - 7 = -15?

  • A. x = -12
  • B. x = -2
  • C. x = 2
  • D. x = 11/2

Survives elimination: B

Why: Adding 7 to each side gives 4x equal to -8, and dividing by 4 gives x equal to -2. Checking: 4 times -2 is -8, minus 7 is -15, which matches. Every wrong option here can be eliminated by substitution alone in under ten seconds, which is why checking is worth the time on a multiple-choice question.

24. Push the coefficient toward zero

Edge cases

The division property says you may divide by any nonzero number.

Discussion prompt

Solve ax = 12 for x, in general. Then describe what happens to the solution as a gets closer and closer to zero, and say what happens at a equal to zero itself. Why is this the same restriction you met in the property table?

Hint: Try a equal to 1, then 0.1, then 0.01.

Answer:

\[ ax = 12 \;\Longrightarrow\; x = \tfrac{12}{a}, \quad a \neq 0 \]

As a shrinks toward zero the solution grows without bound: at a equal to one tenth, x is 120; at one hundredth, 1200. At a equal to zero the equation becomes 0 equals 12, which is false for every x, so there is no solution at all.

That is the same restriction from the division property, seen from the other side: division by zero is not merely awkward, it corresponds to an equation with no solution.

25. Variable on both sides

Section

Section 3

26. Collect variables one way, numbers the other

Concept

When the variable appears on both sides, one extra step comes first: use the addition or subtraction property to gather every variable term on one side and every constant on the other. After that it is an equation you already know how to solve.

\[ 4p + 15 = 7p - 3 \]

Which side you send the variables to is free. Sending them to the side that ends up with a positive coefficient saves you a sign to worry about later.

Figure (svg): A number line style diagram showing the variable terms collected on the left and the constants on the right

The only decision on a both-sides equation is which way to send the variable, and the tidier choice is the one leaving a positive coefficient.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 19-19

27. Two piles, and you choose which way

Picture it

The equation has variable terms and constant terms scattered across both sides.

Figure (svg): A number line style diagram showing the variable terms collected on the left and the constants on the right

The only decision on a both-sides equation is which way to send the variable, and the tidier choice is the one leaving a positive coefficient.

Subtracting 4p sends the variables right and leaves 3p; subtracting 7p sends them left and leaves -3p. Both give p equal to 6, but only one of them avoids dividing by a negative.

28. Worked example: variables on both sides

Worked example

Example 3, which the textbook presents as a multiple-choice question.

\[ \text{Solve } 4p + 15 = 7p - 3. \]

Subtract 4p from each side

Why: Four p is the smaller variable term, so removing it leaves a positive coefficient on the right.

\[ 15 = 3 p - 3 \]

Add 3 to each side

Why: Now the constants are gathered on the left and the variable term stands alone on the right.

\[ 18 = 3 p \]

Divide each side by 3

Why: The coefficient is undone last, as always.

\[ 6 = p \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example variables on both sides shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ p = 6 \]

Verify: substitute 6 into the original

Why: The left side is 4 times 6 plus 15, which is 24 plus 15, or 39. The right side is 7 times 6 minus 3, which is 42 minus 3, also 39. Both sides agree at 39, so 6 is genuinely a solution and not just the end of a chain of arithmetic.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 19-19

29. Which side should the variables go?

Discrimination

Do not solve these. Just say which move avoids a negative coefficient.

Sort into buckets

Sort each equation by the move that leaves a positive coefficient.

Collect on the LEFT
3a + 4 = 2a + 15; 5b - 4 = 2b + 8
Collect on the RIGHT
2z - 3 = 6z + 25; 2c + 14 = 6 - 4c; 6 - 5q = q + 9
left
The left side already carries the larger variable coefficient, so subtracting the right side's variable term leaves a positive number of variables on the left and nothing to worry about later.
right
The right side carries the larger coefficient here — and in the last two cases the left coefficient is negative, so moving everything right is the only way to avoid dividing by a negative at the end.

30. Worked example: the other direction, on purpose

Worked example

Guided Practice 5, solved by sending the variables the awkward way first, to see what it costs.

\[ \text{Solve } -2x + 9 = 2x - 7. \]

Subtract 2x from each side

Why: This sends the variables left, where the coefficient will end up negative — deliberately, to see the cost.

\[ -4 x + 9 = -7 \]

Subtract 9 from each side

Why: The constants gather on the right.

\[ -4 x = -16 \]

Divide each side by -4

Why: Dividing a negative by a negative gives a positive, but this is one more sign decision than the other route required.

\[ x = 4 \]

Compare with the other route

Why: Adding 2x to each side instead gives 9 equals 4x minus 7, then 16 equals 4x, then x equals 4 — the same answer with no negative coefficient anywhere.

\[ x = 4\text{ either way} \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example the other direction, on purpose shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = 4 \]

Verify: substitute 4 into the original

Why: The left side is -8 plus 9, which is 1. The right side is 8 minus 7, which is also 1. Both routes reached the same value and the check confirms it, so the choice of direction really is only about convenience.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 21-21

31. Find the error in the both-sides solution

Error analysis

Exercise 24 as a student solved it. The answer is wrong and one line is responsible.

Annotate

On: \( \begin{aligned} 3y + 7 &= y - 3 \\ 3y + 7 - y &= y - 3 - y \\ 2y + 7 &= -3 \\ 2y &= 4 \\ y &= 2 \end{aligned} \)

  • Subtracting y from each side is a legal move and it is applied to both sides, so lines one and two are fine.
  • Line three is also correct: 3y minus y is 2y, and the right side loses its variable entirely, leaving -3.
  • Line four is the break. Removing 7 from the left requires subtracting 7 from the right as well, giving -3 minus 7, which is -10, not +4. The student appears to have subtracted -3 from 7 instead.
  • Corrected, 2y = -10 gives y = -5. Substituting into the original: the left is -15 plus 7, which is -8, and the right is -5 minus 3, which is -8 as well.

The tell is that the wrong answer is positive while the original equation has a bigger constant on the left, which forces the variable to be negative. A quick sign estimate before solving catches this class of error.

32. Guess the sign of the answer

Prediction

Before solving, estimate. This is a habit that catches sign errors for free.

Predict first

In 2z - 3 = 6z + 25, will z be positive or negative?

  • Positive
  • Negative
  • Zero
  • Cannot tell without solving

Correct: Negative — z equals -7.

\[ 2z - 3 = 6z + 25 \;\longrightarrow\; -28 = 4z \;\longrightarrow\; z = -7 \]

Why: The right side starts 28 higher than the left when z is zero, and each unit increase in z raises the right side faster than the left, since 6 is bigger than 2. So increasing z only widens the gap; the sides can only meet by going the other way, which means z is negative. Solving confirms it: subtracting 2z gives -3 = 4z + 25, then -28 = 4z, so z = -7.

33. Explain the free choice

Explain it

A classmate insists there is a rule about which side the variables must go to.

Discussion prompt

Explain to them why both directions are legal, why one is usually easier, and how they could convince themselves of this in thirty seconds with a single equation.

Hint: The thirty-second demonstration is to solve one equation twice.

Answer:

Both directions use the same property — subtraction of equals from equals — so both produce equivalent equations and both must give the same solution. There is no rule, only a preference.

\[ 4p + 15 = 7p - 3 \;\longrightarrow\; 18 = 3p \quad \text{or} \quad -3p + 15 = -3 \]

The demonstration is exactly that: solve one equation both ways and watch the same answer appear. The right-hand route needs a division by negative three; the left-hand one does not.

34. Both routes, side by side

Comparison

Fill the blanks. Both columns must land on the same solution.

Comparison matrix

StepSend variables rightSend variables left
Start4p + 15 = 7p - 34p + 15 = 7p - 3
Collect15 = 3p - 3-3p + 15 = -3
Constants18 = 3p-3p = -18
Dividep = 6p = 6

The left column never divides by a negative. That is the entire advantage, and it is worth having on a long problem.

35. Brackets and fractions come off first

Section

Section 4

36. Make it look like an equation you have already solved

Concept

If there are brackets, distribute. If there are fractions, multiply every term by the least common denominator. Both moves turn an unfamiliar equation into the familiar both-sides case, and both are single applications of properties you already have.

\[ \tfrac{2}{3}x + \tfrac{5}{6} = x - \tfrac{1}{2} \]

Clearing fractions is the multiplication property of equality applied to the whole equation at once, which is why every term is multiplied, including the ones that have no fraction in them.

Figure (svg): An equation with fractions being multiplied through by the least common denominator to remove every fraction at once

Multiplying every term by the least common denominator clears all the fractions in one legal move.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 20-21

37. One multiplication kills every fraction

Picture it

Denominators of 3, 6 and 2, so the least common denominator is 6.

Figure (svg): An equation with fractions being multiplied through by the least common denominator to remove every fraction at once

Multiplying every term by the least common denominator clears all the fractions in one legal move.

Multiplying by 6 is legal because 6 is not zero. The reason to use the LEAST common denominator rather than any common one is simply that it keeps the resulting numbers small.

38. Worked example: brackets on both sides

Worked example

Example 4. Distribute first, then it is an ordinary both-sides equation.

\[ \text{Solve } 3(5x - 8) = -2(-x + 7) - 12x. \]

Distribute on each side

Why: Three across the left bracket; negative two across the right bracket, including across its negative first term.

\[ 15 x - 24 = 2 x - 14 - 12 x \]

Combine like terms on the right

Why: Two x minus twelve x is negative ten x.

\[ 15 x - 24 = -10 x - 14 \]

Add 10x to each side

Why: Sending the variables left leaves a positive coefficient there.

\[ 25 x - 24 = -14 \]

Add 24 to each side

Why: The constants gather on the right.

\[ 25 x = 10 \]

Divide each side by 25 and simplify

Why: Ten over twenty-five reduces to two fifths.

\[ x = \frac{2}{5} \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example brackets on both sides shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = \tfrac{2}{5} \]

Verify: substitute two fifths into the original

Why: The left side is 3 times the quantity 2 minus 8, which is 3 times -6, or -18. The right side is -2 times the quantity -2/5 plus 7, minus 24/5, which is -2 times 33/5 minus 24/5, or -66/5 minus 24/5, which is -90/5, or -18. Both sides read -18.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 20-20

39. Plan before you compute

Step zero

Look at the equation. Do not solve it.

\[ 3(x + 2) = 5(x + 4) \]

Discussion prompt

In plain English, list the moves you would make and in what order, and say which side you would send the variables to and why. Predict the sign of the answer before you do any arithmetic.

Hint: The right side grows faster as x grows. What does that tell you about where the two sides can be equal?

Answer:

Distribute both brackets, collect variables on the right because 5x is larger than 3x, collect constants on the left, then divide. The right side grows faster and already starts higher at x equal to zero, so the sides can only meet at a negative x.

\[ 3x + 6 = 5x + 20 \;\longrightarrow\; -14 = 2x \;\longrightarrow\; x = -7 \]

40. Worked example: clear the fractions

Worked example

Guided Practice 10. The alternative is to work with fractions throughout, which is legal and unpleasant.

\[ \text{Solve } \tfrac{2}{3}x + \tfrac{5}{6} = x - \tfrac{1}{2}. \]

Find the least common denominator of 3, 6 and 2

Why: Six is divisible by all three, and nothing smaller is.

\[ LCD = 6 \]

Multiply every term on both sides by 6

Why: The multiplication property of equality, applied to the whole equation. Every term is multiplied, including the bare x.

\[ 4 x + 5 = 6 x - 3 \]

Subtract 4x from each side

Why: Sending the variables right leaves a positive coefficient.

\[ 5 = 2 x - 3 \]

Add 3 to each side

Why: The constants gather on the left.

\[ 8 = 2 x \]

Divide each side by 2

Why: The coefficient comes off last.

\[ 4 = x \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example clear the fractions shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = 4 \]

Verify: substitute 4 into the ORIGINAL fractional equation

Why: The left side is two thirds of four plus five sixths, which is eight thirds plus five sixths, or sixteen sixths plus five sixths, which is twenty-one sixths, or 3.5. The right side is 4 minus one half, which is also 3.5. Checking against the original rather than the cleared version is what confirms the clearing step itself.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 21-21

41. Trap: multiplying only the fractional terms

Trap

The trap

\[ \tfrac{2}{3}x + \tfrac{5}{6} = x - \tfrac{1}{2} \]

Multiply the terms that have fractions by 6, leaving x alone

Why: The x looks like it has nothing to clear, so it is skipped.

\[ 4x + 5 = x - 3 \quad \text{(wrong: the x was not multiplied)} \]

\[ 3x = -8, \; x = -\tfrac{8}{3} \]

The fix

\[ \tfrac{2}{3}x + \tfrac{5}{6} = x - \tfrac{1}{2} \]

Multiply EVERY term on both sides by 6

Why: The multiplication property applies to each side as a whole, so a term with no fraction is multiplied like any other.

\[ 4x + 5 = 6x - 3 \]

\[ 8 = 2x, \; x = 4 \]

Substituting the wrong answer back into the original gives different values on the two sides, which is how this one is caught.

42. The clearing step

Fill the middle

Denominators 4 and 5. Fill in the cleared equation.

Fill in the blanks

\tfrac5x + 8x = 780___x + \tfrac______x = 39 \;\xrightarrow___\; ___ \;\longrightarrow\; x = 60

Why: Twenty is the least common denominator of 4 and 5. One quarter of x times 20 is 5x, two fifths of x times 20 is 8x, and — the step that gets forgotten — 39 times 20 is 780. Combining gives 13x equal to 780, so x is 60. Forgetting to multiply the constant is the single most common error in clearing fractions.

43. Find the distribution error

Error analysis

A student solves an equation with brackets. One line is wrong.

Annotate

On: \( \begin{aligned} 3(5x - 8) &= -2(-x + 7) - 12x \\ 15x - 24 &= 2x + 14 - 12x \\ 15x - 24 &= -10x + 14 \\ 25x &= 38 \end{aligned} \)

  • The left side distributes correctly: three times 5x is 15x and three times -8 is -24.
  • On the right, negative two times negative x is positive 2x, which the student got right. But negative two times positive seven is negative fourteen, not positive fourteen. That is the broken line.
  • The error then propagates: the third line collects the variable terms correctly but carries the wrong constant, and the fourth line inherits it.
  • Corrected, the second line is 15x - 24 = 2x - 14 - 12x, which leads to 25x = 10 and x = 2/5. The student's answer of 38/25 fails a substitution check on the very first try.

When a multiplier is negative, every term inside the bracket changes sign - including the ones that were already positive.

44. How sure are you?

Commit first

Answer, then rate your confidence honestly.

Predict first

When you multiply an equation through by the least common denominator, which terms must be multiplied?

  • Only the terms containing fractions
  • Every term on both sides, fractions or not
  • Only the terms on the side with the most fractions
  • Every term on the left, then divide the right

Correct: Every term on both sides, fractions or not.

\[ 6\left(\tfrac{2}{3}x + \tfrac{5}{6}\right) = 6(x) - 6\left(\tfrac{1}{2}\right) \]

\[ 4x + 5 = 6x - 3 \]

Why: The multiplication property of equality multiplies each side as a single quantity, and multiplying a sum means multiplying every term in it — that is the distributive property. A term with no fraction is not exempt; it simply gets larger. Skipping the whole-number terms is the standard way this move goes wrong, and it produces an equation that is no longer equivalent to the original.

45. Building the equation yourself

Section

Section 5

46. Verbal model first, symbols second

Concept

Most equations in real problems are not handed to you — you build them. Write the relationship in words with units attached, then replace each phrase with a number or a letter. Percentages become decimals before they enter.

verbal model — A word equation describing the situation, with each quantity labelled by its unit, written before any symbols.

The unit check is what tells you the equation is at least the right shape: dollars on the left, dollars on the right.

Figure (svg): A verbal model showing income equals wages plus percent for tips times food bills, with the equation underneath

Fifteen percent becomes 0.15 before it enters the equation, and the units confirm the setup adds like to like.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 19-19

47. From four boxes to one equation

Picture it

A waiter earns 30 dollars in wages plus 15 percent of the food bills, and takes home 105 dollars.

Figure (svg): A verbal model showing income equals wages plus percent for tips times food bills, with the equation underneath

Fifteen percent becomes 0.15 before it enters the equation, and the units confirm the setup adds like to like.

Fifteen percent becomes 0.15 in the model, not in the middle of the solving. Converting early is what keeps the arithmetic honest.

48. Worked example: the waiter's food bills

Worked example

Example 2. The equation is the hard part; the solving is three lines.

\[ \text{Wages of } \$30 \text{ plus } 15\% \text{ of food bills } x \text{ gives } \$105. \text{ Find } x. \]

Write the verbal model in units

Why: Income equals wages plus tip rate times food bills. Dollars on both sides, so the equation is well formed.

\[ \text{income } =\text{ wages } +\text{ rate } \times\text{ bills} \]

Convert the percent to a decimal and write the equation

Why: Fifteen percent is fifteen hundredths, or 0.15. It has no unit, which is why it can multiply dollars and still give dollars.

\[ 105 = 30 + 0.15 x \]

Subtract 30 from each side

Why: The wages are the constant wrapped around the variable term.

\[ 75 = 0.15 x \]

Divide each side by 0.15

Why: The coefficient comes off last.

\[ 500 = x \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example the waiter's food bills shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ x = 500 \quad \text{dollars in food bills} \]

Verify: substitute back into the situation, not just the equation

Why: Fifteen percent of 500 dollars is 75 dollars in tips, and 75 plus the 30 dollars of wages is 105 dollars — the stated earnings. Checking against the words rather than the symbols also confirms the model was the right one.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 19-19

49. Turn a messy situation into one equation

Real world

A gym charges a 40 dollar joining fee plus 25 dollars a month. You have budgeted 340 dollars for the year.

Discussion prompt

Write the equation whose solution is the number of months you can afford, say what unit each part carries, and then say what you would do with the answer if it came out as a decimal.

Hint: Think about what a fractional month would mean in this situation.

Answer:

\[ 340 = 40 + 25m \;\Longrightarrow\; 300 = 25m \;\Longrightarrow\; m = 12 \]

Dollars on both sides: the fee is dollars, and dollars per month times months gives dollars. Here it comes out whole, but had it come out as 12.4 you would round down to 12, because you cannot buy part of a month. Rounding direction is decided by the situation, never by the arithmetic.

50. Worked example: the estate agent's target

Worked example

Guided Practice 4. Same shape, bigger numbers, and a commission instead of tips.

\[ \text{Base salary } \$22\,000 \text{ plus } 4\% \text{ commission on sales } s \text{ gives } \$60\,000. \]

Write the verbal model

Why: Total earnings equals base salary plus commission rate times total sales.

\[ \text{earnings } =\text{ base } +\text{ rate } \times\text{ sales} \]

Write the equation with 4 percent as 0.04

Why: Four percent is four hundredths. Writing 4 instead of 0.04 is the classic error and inflates the answer a hundredfold.

\[ 60000 = 22000 + 0.04 s \]

Subtract 22000 from each side

Why: The base salary is guaranteed regardless of sales, so it comes off first.

\[ 38000 = 0.04 s \]

Divide each side by 0.04

Why: Dividing by four hundredths is the same as multiplying by twenty-five.

\[ 950000 = s \]

Figure (svg): The solution to Worked example the estate agent's target shown as a ladder of expressions, one row per algebraic move

The whole solution at once: each drop is one legal move.

\[ s = 950\,000 \quad \text{dollars of sales} \]

Verify: compute the commission directly

Why: Four percent of 950,000 dollars is 38,000 dollars, and 38,000 plus the 22,000 base is exactly 60,000 dollars. The size is also plausible: a 4 percent commission means sales must be roughly twenty-five times the commission needed, and 25 times 38,000 is 950,000.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 19-19

51. The percent that never became a decimal

Error analysis

A student sets up the estate-agent problem and gets an answer that is obviously too small.

Annotate

On: \( 60\,000 = 22\,000 + 4s \;\Longrightarrow\; 38\,000 = 4s \;\Longrightarrow\; s = 9500 \)

  • The algebra is flawless. Subtracting 22,000 and dividing by 4 are both correctly applied to both sides.
  • The model is what broke. Writing 4 instead of 0.04 says the agent earns four dollars of commission for every dollar of sales, which would be a remarkable arrangement.
  • The size of the answer is the giveaway: 9,500 dollars of sales cannot produce 38,000 dollars of commission at any rate below 400 percent.
  • Corrected, the rate is 0.04 and the sales figure is 950,000 dollars - exactly one hundred times larger, which is the signature of a misplaced percent.

Convert every percent to a decimal in the verbal model, before the equation exists. An answer that is off by a factor of a hundred is almost always this.

52. Situation to equation

Matching

Each situation becomes exactly one of these equations.

Match the pairs

  • l1. Wages of 30 dollars plus 15 percent of food bills gives 105 dollars
  • l2. Base 22,000 dollars plus 4 percent commission gives 60,000 dollars
  • l3. A 40 dollar fee plus 25 dollars a month gives 340 dollars
  • l4. A train covers 457 miles in 6.5 hours at an average rate r
  • r1. 105 = 30 + 0.15x
  • r2. 60000 = 22000 + 0.04s
  • r3. 340 = 40 + 25m
  • r4. 457 = 6.5r

Why: Three of the four have the same shape: a fixed amount plus a rate times an unknown. The rates differ in kind — a percent, a percent, and dollars per month — but they enter identically. The fourth has no fixed amount at all, which is what makes it a pure rate problem rather than a start-plus-rate problem.

53. How big before you solve

Estimation

The waiter earns 105 dollars, of which 30 is wages, with tips at 15 percent.

Predict first

Roughly how large must the food bills be?

  • About 100 dollars
  • About 500 dollars
  • About 700 dollars
  • About 5000 dollars

Correct: About 500 dollars.

\[ 75 = 0.15x \;\Longrightarrow\; x = 500 \]

Why: Tips account for 75 dollars, and 15 percent is roughly one sixth, so the bills must be roughly six times 75, which is about 450 — close enough to identify the right option. The exact answer is 500. Estimating first means a misplaced decimal in the division by 0.15 cannot survive, and dividing by a number smaller than one is exactly where decimals slip.

54. One of these models is wrong

Two truths and a lie

All three claim to model the waiter's evening.

Eliminate the wrong options

Two of these are correct models. Knock those out and keep the broken one.

  • A. 105 = 30 + 0.15x
  • B. 105 - 30 = 0.15x
  • C. 105 = 30 + 15x

Survives elimination: C

Why: The survivor is the broken one. Writing 15 rather than 0.15 claims the waiter receives fifteen dollars of tips for every dollar of food ordered. It gives x equal to 5, meaning five dollars of food bills produced seventy-five dollars in tips, which the situation immediately contradicts.

55. Which first move does each equation want?

Comparison

Fill the blanks. The shape of the equation, not its difficulty, decides the opening move.

Comparison matrix

Equation shapeFirst moveWhat it becomes
4x + 9 = 21subtract the constant4x = 12
(4/5)x + 8 = 20subtract 8, then multiply by the reciprocalx = 15
4p + 15 = 7p - 3collect variables one side15 = 3p - 3
3(x + 2) = 5(x + 4)distribute both brackets3x + 6 = 5x + 20
(2/3)x + 5/6 = x - 1/2multiply every term by the LCD4x + 5 = 6x - 3

Every row after the first reduces to the first row within two moves. That is the whole strategy: make it look like something you have already solved.

56. The procedure, in order

Pattern

One routine solves every linear equation in this chapter.

  1. If the problem is in words, write the verbal model with units first, converting any percent to a decimal before it enters the equation.
  2. Clear the brackets by distributing, taking the sign in front of each bracket with the multiplier.
  3. Clear the fractions by multiplying every term on both sides by the least common denominator — including the terms that have no fraction.
  4. Collect the variable terms on the side that already has more of them, and the constants on the other, using the addition or subtraction property.
  5. Undo the coefficient last, by dividing both sides by it or multiplying both sides by its reciprocal, then substitute the answer into the ORIGINAL equation to check.

The check is not optional politeness. It is the only step that uses the original equation, so it is the only step capable of catching an error made in step two.

OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry 2e, §2.2 Linear Equations in One Variable §2.2

57. Check yourself 1 of 3

Check

Variable on both sides. Solve it on paper first.

Check your understanding

What is the solution of 7t - 5 = 3t + 11?

  • A. t = 4 (correct)
  • B. t = 3/2
  • C. t = -3/2
  • D. t = 8/5

Answer: A

Why: Subtracting 3t from each side gives 4t - 5 = 11, adding 5 gives 4t = 16, and dividing by 4 gives t = 4. Checking: 28 - 5 is 23, and 12 + 11 is 23.

Why B tempts people
This subtracts 5 from the right instead of adding it, giving 4t = 6. The 5 is being subtracted on the left, so undoing it means adding 5 to both sides.
Why C tempts people
Same arithmetic slip as B, with an additional sign error when dividing. Substituting gives -15.5 on the left and 6.5 on the right, which are not equal.
Why D tempts people
This collects the variables on the wrong side and then mismatches the constants, giving 5t = 8. Substituting 8/5 gives 6.2 on the left and 15.8 on the right.

58. Check yourself 2 of 3

Check

Brackets on both sides. Distribute before anything else.

Check your understanding

What is the solution of 3(x + 2) = 5(x + 4)?

  • A. x = -7 (correct)
  • B. x = 7
  • C. x = -13
  • D. x = 13/8

Answer: A

Why: Distributing gives 3x + 6 = 5x + 20. Subtracting 3x gives 6 = 2x + 20, subtracting 20 gives -14 = 2x, and dividing gives x = -7. Both sides then read -15.

Why B tempts people
The sign was lost when dividing -14 by 2. Substituting 7 gives 27 on the left and 55 on the right, which are far apart — the sides only meet on the negative side.
Why C tempts people
The 6 and the 20 were combined as -26 rather than -14, which happens when 6 is subtracted from -20 instead of 20 being subtracted from 6.
Why D tempts people
The brackets were not distributed; instead 3 and 5 were added to the contents. Distribution multiplies every term inside, so the 2 becomes 6 and the 4 becomes 20.

59. Check yourself 3 of 3

Check

A word problem. Build the equation before you solve it.

Check your understanding

A real estate agent earns a base salary of 22,000 dollars plus 4 percent commission on total sales. How much must the agent sell to earn 60,000 dollars in a year?

  • A. 950,000 dollars (correct)
  • B. 9,500 dollars
  • C. 1,500,000 dollars
  • D. 38,000 dollars

Answer: A

Why: The equation is 60,000 = 22,000 + 0.04s. Subtracting gives 38,000 = 0.04s, and dividing by 0.04 gives 950,000. Four percent of 950,000 really is 38,000.

Why B tempts people
The percent was written as 4 rather than 0.04, so the answer came out a hundred times too small. Four percent of 9,500 is only 380 dollars.
Why C tempts people
The base salary was added rather than subtracted, giving 82,000 divided by 0.04. The base is earned regardless of sales, so it must come off the target first.
Why D tempts people
This is the commission needed, not the sales required to generate it. The question asks how much must be sold, which is the commission divided by the rate.

60. Where this shows up outside the textbook

Real world

Two phone plans. Plan A charges 20 dollars a month plus 10 cents a minute. Plan B charges 35 dollars a month plus 4 cents a minute.

Discussion prompt

Write the equation that finds the number of minutes at which the two plans cost the same, solve it, and then say which plan is cheaper below that number and which is cheaper above it. How did you decide which is which without solving anything twice?

Hint: Compare the two monthly fees at zero minutes, then think about which cost rises faster.

Answer:

\[ 20 + 0.10m = 35 + 0.04m \;\Longrightarrow\; 0.06m = 15 \;\Longrightarrow\; m = 250 \]

At zero minutes Plan A is 15 dollars cheaper, so Plan A wins below 250 minutes. Plan A's cost rises faster — ten cents a minute against four — so it must lose above the crossing point. The starting gap and the rate of increase settle the direction without any second calculation.

This is exactly the reasoning you will formalise in Chapter 3 as solving a system, and again in Chapter 2 as comparing two lines by their slopes and intercepts.

61. How sure are you?

Commit first

Answer, then rate your confidence honestly.

Predict first

You multiply both sides of an equation by 3 and then by 5. Could you have got the same result in one step, and does the order matter?

  • Yes, multiply by 15; order does not matter
  • Yes, multiply by 8; order does not matter
  • Yes, multiply by 15, but only in that order
  • No, two separate steps give something different from one

Correct: Yes, multiply by 15 — and the order does not matter.

\[ 5 \cdot (3 \cdot a) = (5 \cdot 3) \cdot a = 15a \]

Why: Multiplying by 3 and then by 5 multiplies each side by 15, because multiplication is associative and commutative. Those are exactly the properties from Lesson 1.1, now doing real work: they are what guarantee that combining two legal moves gives another legal move. Adding the multipliers to get 8 confuses repeated multiplication with repeated addition.

62. Explain it to someone a year behind you

Explain it

They can solve 2x equals 10 but freeze when the variable appears twice.

Discussion prompt

In four sentences or fewer, explain what to do when the variable is on both sides, why it is allowed, and how they would know their answer is right without asking anyone.

Hint: The last part is one sentence about substitution.

Answer:

A usable answer: subtract the smaller variable term from both sides, which leaves the variable on one side only. It is allowed because subtracting the same thing from both sides is one of the four properties of equality, so the balance is preserved.

Then they check by putting their answer back into the original equation and confirming both sides give the same number. That check needs no teacher and no answer key, which is the point of it.

63. Exit ticket

Exit ticket

Name the weakest spot before you close the deck.

Predict first

Which of these would you least want handed to you cold on a quiz?

  • An equation with a fraction as the coefficient
  • An equation with the variable on both sides
  • An equation with brackets preceded by a minus sign
  • A word problem you have to turn into an equation yourself

Correct: Whichever you picked is tonight's ten minutes, and each has a one-line fix.

Why: For a fractional coefficient, multiply by the reciprocal rather than dividing. For both sides, send the variables toward whichever side already has more of them. For a negative in front of a bracket, write the multiplier with its sign attached before you distribute. For a word problem, write the verbal model in units before any symbols, converting percents to decimals first. Do five of your chosen kind rather than twenty mixed ones.

64. Draw the lesson on one page

Connect it up

On paper. Fifteen minutes, and worth more than rereading.

Draw it

At the top of a page draw a balance scale and write the four properties of equality beside it, marking with a star the two that carry the nonzero restriction. Down the left margin write five equation shapes: variable on one side, fractional coefficient, variable on both sides, brackets, and fractions. Beside each write its first move in five words or fewer. In the middle of the page solve one equation of your own that needs at least three of those five moves, writing the property name beside every line. At the bottom write a short real situation with a fixed amount and a rate, turn it into an equation, solve it, and then write one sentence saying what the answer means in the situation rather than what the number is.

If that last sentence is hard to write, the algebra was fine but the model was never really yours. Go back to Section 5.

65. What you can do now

Recap

Five things, and the fifth is what the rest of this book keeps asking for.

If you seeThe first move is
A bracketDistribute, sign included
A fraction anywhereMultiply every term by the LCD
The variable twiceCollect toward the bigger coefficient
A fractional coefficientMultiply by its reciprocal
A percent in the wordsConvert it to a decimal first

Lesson 1.4 takes the same four properties and applies them to a formula with several letters, where the goal is not a number but a rearranged equation.

McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations §1.3, pp. 18-25 — everything on these slides traces back here

Sources

  1. McDougal Littell Algebra 2 (Texas Edition), Ch. 1 Equations and Inequalities — Lesson 1.3 Solve Linear Equations — Larson, Boswell, Kanold & Stiff, McDougal Littell / Houghton Mifflin, 2007, pp. 18-25
  2. OpenStax Algebra and Trigonometry 2e, §2.2 Linear Equations in One Variable

Want this taught 1-on-1? Alexander tutors Algebra 2 — $55/session, free consultation.

Book on Wyzant · Text (657) 465-8108